Timeline

Audience Reviews

View More

Robert P @Superbad Sep 16, 2026 Timeline = a *2* star Movie! See more Matthew D @OceanSage Sep 1, 2026 A charming picture with a phenomenal cast with practical effects and massive sets! Richard Donner’s science-fiction adventure Timeline (2003) is an incredibly fun and strange cinematic oddity. Paul Walker is likable enough as the hero Chris Johnston, who is dismissive of history, yet learns to appreciate the past and life throughout Timeline. Frances O’Connor is passionate as archaeologist Kate Ericson. She is playful, exciting, and effortlessly endearing as Kate in Timeline. Billy Connelly is absolutely hilarious as Archaeology Professor E.A. Johnston with quick quips and silly banter with Paul Walker and Gerard Butler. He’s naturally funny, so Connelly will surely get a laugh out of you. Gerard Butler is engaging and heroic as a history buff and devoted archaeologist Andre Marek, who is stuck in the past. Butler’s chemistry with the adorable redhead actress Anna Friel is on fire. Her fiery spirit and gentle manner make her memorable and endearing as Lady Claire. See more Stefan S @Britscher99 Jun 8, 2026 Kann verstehen das man Ihn nicht mag. Mag ihn aber trotzdem. See more J B @Hooly Dec 14, 2025 WARNING ⚠️ THIS "FILM" IS TOXIC. My god. This is one of the worst attempts at filmmaking it's ever been my displeasure to try & watch. Absolute drivel. Give everybody a job, dial it in tossery. Staggering really, to think that someone at the studio said "yeah, that's a wrap, lets release it" - it has to be a tax job, or just keeping a bored film crew & actors in work between "actual" films. I expect everyone got paid. They probably had to sign some form of non disclosure agreement, aswell. "Not me guv" - I know nothing. I've already used too many words for this stnking pile - go on, watch it. Watch the whole thing, no beaks, I dare you. I double dare you. Life just got shorter by 97 mins. See more Voxn T @RT25114294 Sep 11, 2025 Was entertained throughout the movie See more Roland S @RT47283518 Aug 23, 2025 I found it profoundly irritating because it demonstrated a complete lack of understanding of mediaeval France. It was set in the Dordogne, right? Very few people there would have understood French, which was essentially the language of Paris - a long way away, given the lack of decent roads - so an American student, even with a thorough grasp of Old French, probably wouldn't have got very far. Maybe if he had a comprehensive grounding in mediaeval Occitan dialects he might have stood a better chance, though that wouldn't be guaranteed. Notice also that none of the young Americans is affected by culture shock - which should be extreme - and none of them is struck down with any of the diseases which were common at the time, such as typhoid, plague, cholera or dysentery (although they were mostly not called by those names.) I'm afraid that having an intuitive grasp of French history and culture ruined the film for me. See more Read all reviews

Timeline

My Rating

Read More Read Less WRITE A REVIEW EDIT REVIEW POST RATING